There was a time when ‘Indian
dance’ was synonymous with ‘solo’ performances. With classical dance branching
out into group choreography, and with the advent of ‘Indian contemporary
dance’, this is no longer the case. In both the classical and contemporary
dance scenarios in India, dance troupes and companies are coming into being and
expanding; and far less frequently, but silently coming into existence – are
egalitarian and democratic artistic collaborations.
Every young dancer who steps into
the professional realm of collaborative dance – whether it is joining a dance
company where there is quite a gap, hierarchically, between the artistic
director and dancer; or if it is doing a project with other artists as ‘equals’
–is faced with the question of where to draw the line.
Before I explain what I mean to
say by ‘drawing the line’, I must confess that I do not have the answers to the
questions I invoke in this essay. I do not claim to know where to draw the
line. But given how several young dancers give up on their aesthetic beliefs
and values without blinking, naively believing that agreeing to do anything and
everything asked of them makes them ‘open minded’, I thought the question of
where to draw the line is worthy of being thrown out in the open.
Let me try and explain what I
mean when I talk about ‘drawing the line’. Ideally, a great dancer, after years
of rigorous training, develops his or her personal aesthetic and style. Whether
he or she remains profusely loyal to a technique, or decides to rebel against
it – a dancer becomes known for his or her individualism within the generic
‘style’ or ‘form’ of dance. Therein, at least I believe so, lies the excitement
and uniqueness. But therein also lies the complication during collaborations
with regard to the question of ‘drawing the line’.
When two or more artists with
their individual artistic convictions and aesthetic perceptions enter a common
space, there is often a clash of individual identities in the form of aesthetic
and artistic disagreements. In an egalitarian collaboration, whose individual
vision will prevail and who compromises depends on how the artists negotiate
their creative terms. The artists, together in a democratic space, may be able
to work out to what extent they are willing to compromise on their aesthetic
values before they draw the line.
But what happens in a situation
where a young dancer is working under
a well-known choreographer, or a young student joins his or her teacher’s dance
troupe/company? In other words, what happens when the situation is not equal?
When hierarchically, the artists in question are not on the same ‘level’? Does
the willingness of a dancer to work under unequal conditions imply a
willingness to compromise on artistic values?
It is a well-argued and justified
defense that a dancer has the choice to work with one choreographer and not
another. On researching the two choreographers, a dancer can make an informed
guess at which choreographer is less likely to clash with his or her aesthetic
choices. But hypothetically, if a dancer finds himself or herself in a
situation where he or she is being forced to dance in a manner that clashes
with their artistic and aesthetic values, where can a dancer draw the line? Has
a dancer been able to draw the line? Or has the answer so far lied in the
extremes – silently compromise whatever needs to be compromised or be forced to
abandon the collaboration?
No comments:
Post a Comment